I’ve now seen about a half dozen television and published interviews with
Elizabeth Edwards as she promotes her new book “Resilience” and have so many thoughts I would really love to hear what other women are thinking.
Just to catch everybody up, the wife of the former Democratic Presidential candidate John Edwards has written a book in which she describes what she went thru when she found her husband had had an affair. We learn that he initially told her it was a one-night-stand, which is why she not only stood by him when he announced his candidacy, but whole-heartedly campaigned for him. (all, by the way, while waging her personal battle with cancer) She then writes that he later came clean, admitting to a full-fledged affair, an affair that appears to have produced a child.
My first reaction to her interview on Oprah and the subsequent interviews was that it seemed a little too soon to write about the whole thing. It took me years to process my being left at the altar to the extent I could look at it objectively and honestly. There’s no way I could have written about it within two years of it happening. Elizabeth seemed to me to still be hurting and still to be trying to navigate the choppy waters of their now-shaky marriage. She did not appear to be a woman healed and feeling whole and healthy following such a betrayal. It also seemed really, really weird (if any of you saw the Oprah interview) to have John there at the house while she did the interview, looking like a little boy who was in a whole lot of trouble with his parents.
Which led me to my second thought, which was why write this now? Why spend all that time writing and promoting a book now while she, admittedly, has no idea how much time she has left in her fight with cancer? The couple has young children at home, children, who no doubt have access to the internet and can read all the stories (the true ones and the gossipy ones) about their parents. Not to mention the things they probably hear from other kids at school. What happened to their mom and to their family was painful enough. But why expose the story to the world and leave the kids so exposed themselves?
Yes, I understand that the Edwards are public people. And the world is interested in them. I also understand that in telling her story HERSELF, Elizabeth can take a little control in what’s said about her and her marriage and her family. That, I get.
But I couldn’t help wondering if in writing this book so soon, way before she’s had time to properly heal herself and her marriage, that Elizabeth wasn’t in some way, even unconcsciously, trying to punish and humiliate John for his betrayal. Think about it. What’s the one thing that could hurt a man with an ego big enough to run for president? Exposing him for what he is. A cheater. A cheater who cheated on his wife of 30 years, the mother of his children, a woman WITH CANCER. A narcissist, bold enough to have an affair while the nation’s cameras were focused on him. A coward, who when he did confess, couldn’t even look her in the eye and admit that it was an actual AFFAIR, not a one-time lapse of judgement. And a man so selfish that he won’t even find out if the child the woman had is, in fact, his, and give that child an actual name, (there’s no father listed on the birth certificate!) an actual father.
Come to think about it. Forget what I said before. Maybe Elizabeth did the right thing afterall. A little humility might be just what her husband needs before they can even begin to put their lives back together, something Elizabeth, seems to want.
Your thoughts?

8 comments
Comments feed for this article
May 27, 2009 at 9:02 pm
Claudia
The first thing I thought was Elizabeth Edwards was writing this book because she wanted the truth to be told and from what I hear…she isn’t going to be around to do that later. She wasn’t truthful however when she stated that the baby did not effect her life or that of her children. Like it or not an innocent child will need a father and will seek out siblings. I think John is an awful person….I also think Elizabeth is lying to herself. All of this mess effects everyone involved. It’s a sad story ~ tragic. Resilience as defined in Webster’s Dictionary is “an ability to recover from or adjust easily to misfortune or change”. I don’t believe this is the case.
May 27, 2009 at 9:14 pm
Jay Barber
I know you asked women what they were thinking, but…..
First reaction, second thought, then, no, forget about that, its humiliation she’s after…. Now, Ms. Kennedy, which one is it, really? (Just kidding….)
Isn’t it all three, to some degree? For starters, she doesn’t have much time left on this Earth, so the answer to the question of “why now” is really that. This certainty then consumes the fact that she isn’t really “ready” emotionally to write this story. On timing, then, I say she has no choice–its now or never.
But one can never underestimate Ms. Kennedy’s third theory–the humiliation of it all. “Hell hath no fury like the woman scorned…” and all that. There is certainly a “pound of flesh” being extracted here. But she knows, deep down, that despite the “humiliation” of his being “outed” on this whole “affair” (pun intended), the cad will not change, as most narcissists never do. Mrs. Edwards will soon pass, regrettably, and we’ll soon thereafter see Mr. Edwards with a lovely (and much younger) blond in tow…
May 27, 2009 at 9:19 pm
Mickey Goodwin
Wow! Good job, Kiki! Very well said!
There is a lot of truth in what you wrote: Elizabeth Edwards has hardly processed what is happening (present tense!) to her marriage… yet she is going to write a tell-all book?
So, Kiki, I agree with you. Tell it like it is, sister!
mick.
xoxox
May 27, 2009 at 10:28 pm
AP
I grew up in Thomaston. I learned values, commitment and wedding vows are something that you do not take lightly. I have been married for 24yrs and have NEVER though about having an affair or leaving my wife. I have mixed feelings about this one. Could John Edwards not control himself and be committed to his wife, his kids and be true to himself, and like Kim, I wonder why Mrs. Edwards came out so soon with a book about it or would ever write about it? It seems like people now days do not see marriage and commitment like people did years ago. Count the number of your friends that have been married, divorced and remarried and so on and so on. Don’t get me wrong, I do understand that sometimes divorce is the only option. It seems like it’s way too easy to get married and it’s way too easy to get a divorce.
May 29, 2009 at 12:40 am
Courtney
After reading this i wonder if Mrs. Edwards wrote the book thinking that her kids would have questions about how she felt about the whole thing and she would not be around to answer them. Of course we don’t know all that happened behind closed doors, maybe there is something else that pushed her to write this book. Of course your husband lied to you and had a long affair…..i say roast him. But at some point you have to ask yourself are you doing this public bashing for you or for the public to understand better…….In her case she is most likely doing both because she doesn’t have as much time to heal as other people do.
May 29, 2009 at 6:50 pm
Kerry
You mention how she doesn’t look whole or healed…how could she be
without Jesus? Granted, I haven’t finished the book (I keep giving it
away! I can’t keep my hands on one long enough!), but I think you
even mentioned that you couldn’t heal until you let the Lord do the
dirty work and heal you from the inside out. I know I feel the same
way. She’s not going to be whole and healthy until she can forgive
him…and we can’t even begin to understand that without Him.
I have a really amazing woman in my life who stood by me and took care
of me when my life was a mess. When I believed the lies, she would
get angry for me, she would defend me…but she never spoke an ugly
word about my parents. And then, when I got stronger and would get
(justifiably) angry…and hurt…and couldn’t understand how or why my
parents didn’t (or wouldn’t…or couldn’t) love me, she would always
ask me how I could ever expect them to be able to love me. Not
because of who I was, but who they were…or, more aptly put, who they
were without. If Jesus is love, and they don’t have Him, how could I
expect them to love me well? I think the same is true here…if she
hasn’t been forgiven (or received the forgiveness, I guess) and she
hasn’t felt the touch of the Healer for her own shortcomings, she’s
not going to be able to heal from the shortcomings of someone else.
June 2, 2009 at 5:07 am
CB Hackworth
I think she wrote it because (a) we all think other people are more interested in our problems than they really are, (b) she’s vengeful, and (c) if she waits to write it, she’ll probably be dead.
September 20, 2009 at 5:07 am
LAM
I think she wrote it because she know her time here is limited, and she wanted something of her perspective, albeit w/out the benefit of time and perspective, in writing. I admire her for going on the record instead of dying without a word.She seems a strong woman, not a victim, as a result.
If women don’t speak out in these instances, we perpetuate misogyny. We communicate to young women that they should hide and be embarrassed and humiliated when a man behaves badly — that it is somehow their fault, when it isn’t and they have nothing to be ashamed of.
My heart and compassion go out to Mrs. Edwards. And for John Edwards’ sake, I hope he and she can reconcile before her death. I lost my husband when I was 37, and cannot imagine how much worse it would have been, ironically, had we not adored each other!